In library science, authority control is a technical process to organize library catalog and bibliographic information for greater efficiency.[1][2] A single unique heading term for each subject is established by cataloguers, including subjects such as authors, books, series or corporations. That heading is then used consistently, uniquely, and unambiguously to describe all references to that same subject despite variations, such as different spellings, pen names, aliases, and so forth.[3] The unique header can guide users to all relevant information including related or collocated subjects.[3] Authority records can be combined into a database and called an authority file, and maintaining and updating these files as well as "logical linkages"[4] to other files within them is the work of librarians and other information cataloguers. Accordingly, authority control is an example of controlled vocabulary and of bibliographic control. While in theory any piece of information is amenable to authority control such as personal and corporate names, uniform titles, series, and subjects,[2] library cataloguers typically focus on author names and book titles. Subject headings from the Library of Congress fulfill a function similar to authority records, although they are usually considered separately. As time passes, information changes, prompting needs for reorganization. According to one view, authority control is not about creating a perfect seamless system but rather it is an ongoing effort to keep up with these changes and try to bring "structure and order" to the task of helping users find information.[5] Authority control provides consistency of headings,[6] linkages and cross references,[7][6] scope and usage of a particular heading, and helps assist catalog maintenance by the library staff.[5]

Benefits of authority controlEdit

  • Better researching. Authority control helps researchers get a handle on a specific subject with less wasted effort.[3] It enables a catalog to be set up so that, with some applications, typing in a few words of an entry will bring up the already established term or phrase, thus improving accuracy and saving time.[8]
  • Makes searching more predictable.[9] It can be used in conjunction with keyword searching using "and" or "not" or "or" or other Boolean operators on a web browser.[4] It increases chances that a given search will return all relevant items.[8]
  • Consistency of records.[10][11][12]
  • Organization and structure of information.[3]
  • Efficiency for cataloguers. The process of authority control is not only of great help to researchers searching for a particular subject to study, but it can help cataloguers organize information as well. Cataloguers can use authority records when trying to categorize new items, since they can see which records have already been catalogued and can therefore avoid unnecessary work.[3][4]
  • Maximises library resources.[3]
  • Easier to maintain the catalog. It enables cataloguers to detect and correct errors. In some instances, software programs support workers tasked with maintaining the catalog to do ongoing tasks such as automated clean-up.[13] It helps creators and users of metadata.[8]
  • Fewer errors. It can help catch errors caused by typos or misspellings which can sometimes accumulate over time, sometimes known as quality drift. For example, machines can catch misspellings such as "Elementary school techers" and "Pumpkilns" which can then be corrected by library staff.[5]


Differing names describe the same subjectEdit

Sometimes within a catalog there are different names or spellings for only one person or subject.[3][9] This can bring confusion since researchers may miss some information. Authority control is used by cataloguers to collocate materials that logically belong together but which present themselves differently. Records are used to establish uniform titles which collocate all versions of a given work under one unique heading even when such versions are issued under different titles. With authority control, one unique preferred name represents all variations and will include different variations, spellings and misspellings, uppercase versus lowercase variants, differing dates, and so forth. For example, in Wikipedia, the subject of Princess Diana is described by an article Diana, Princess of Wales as well as numerous other descriptors, but both Princess Diana and Diana, Princess of Wales describe the same person; an authority record would choose one title as the preferred one for consistency. In an online library catalog, various entries might look like the following:[2]

  1. Diana. (1)
  2. Diana, Princess of Wales. (1)
  3. Diana, Princess of Wales, 1961- (13)
  4. Diana, Princess of Wales 1961- (1)
  5. Diana, Princess of Wales, 1961- (2)
  6. DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES, 1961-1997. (1)
  7. Diana, Princess of Wales, -- Iconography. (2)[2]

These different terms describe the same person. Accordingly, authority control reduces these entries to one unique entry or official authorized heading, sometimes termed an access point:

Diana, Princess of Wales, 1961-[2]

Same name describes two different subjectsEdit

Sometimes two different authors have been published under the same name.[3] This can happen if there is a title which is identical to another title or to a collective uniform title.[3] This, too, can cause confusion. Different authors can be distinguished correctly from each other by, for example, adding a middle initial to one of the names; in addition, other information can be added to one entry to clarify the subject, such as birth year, death year, range of active years such as 1918-1965 when the person flourished, or a brief descriptive epithet. When cataloguers come across different subjects with similar or identical headings, they can disambiguate them using authority control.

Authority records and filesEdit

A customary way of enforcing authority control in a bibliographic catalog is to set up a separate index of authority records, which relates to and governs the headings used in the main catalog. This separate index is often referred to as an "authority file." It contains an indexable record of all decisions made by cataloguers in a given library (or — as is increasingly the case — cataloguing consortium), which cataloguers consult when making, or revising, decisions about headings. As a result, the records contain documentation about sources used to establish a particular preferred heading, and may contain information discovered while researching the heading which may be useful.[13]

While authority files provide information about a particular subject, their primary function is not to provide information but to organize it.[13] They contain enough information to establish that a given author or title is unique, but that is all; irrelevant but interesting information is generally excluded. Although practices vary internationally, authority records in the English-speaking world generally contain:

  • Headings show the preferred title chosen as the official and authorized version. It is important that the heading be unique; if there is a conflict with an identical heading, then one of the two will have to be chosen:
Since the headings function as access points, making sure that they are distinct and not in conflict with existing entries is important. For example, the English novelist William Collins (1824-89), whose works include the Moonstone and The Woman in White is better known as Wilkie Collins. Cataloguers have to decide which name the public would most likely look under, and whether to use a see also reference to link alternative forms of an individual's name.
—Moya K. Mason.[14][15]
  • Cross references are other forms of the name or title that might appear in the catalog and include:
  1. see references are forms of the name or title that describe the subject but which have been passed over or deprecated in favor of the authorized heading form
  2. see also references point to other forms of the name or title that are also authorized. These see also references generally point to earlier or later forms of a name or title.
  • Statement(s) of justification is a brief account made by the cataloguer about particular information sources used to determine both authorized and deprecated forms. Sometimes this means citing the title and publication date of the source, the location of the name or title on that source, and the form in which it appears on that source.
File:An example of an authority record.png

For example, the Irish writer Brian O'Nolan, who lived from 1911 to 1966, wrote under many pen names such as Flann O'Brien and Myles na Gopaleen. Catalogers at the United States Library of Congress chose one form -- "O'Brien, Flann, 1911-1966" -- as the official heading.[16] The example contains all three elements of a valid authority record: the first heading O'Brien, Flann, 1911-1966 is the form of the name that the Library of Congress chose as authoritative. In theory, every record in the catalog that represents a work by this author should have this form of the name as its author heading. What follows immediately below the heading beginning with Na Gopaleen, Myles, 1911-1966 are the see references. These forms of the author's name will appear in the catalog, but only as transcriptions and not as headings. If a user queries the catalog under one of these variant forms of the author's name, he or she would receive the response: "See O’Brien, Flann, 1911-1966." There is an apparent misspelling of a pen name: "Na gCopaleen, Myles, 1911-1966" has an extra "C" inserted. So if a library user comes across an incorrect spelling of the pen name, he or she will be led to the proper spelling regardless. See also references, which point from one authorized heading to another authorized heading, are exceedingly rare for personal name authority records, although they often appear in name authority records for corporate bodies. The final four entries in this record beginning with His At Swim-Two-Birds ... 1939. constitute the justification for this particular form of the name: it appeared in this form on the 1939 edition of the author's novel At Swim-Two-Birds, whereas the author's other noms de plume appeared on later publications.

File:Sample Catalog Record.png
File:Sample Name Authority Record.png

Access control Edit

The act of choosing a single authorized heading to represent all forms of a name is often difficult, sometimes arbitrary and on occasion politically sensitive. An alternative is the idea of access control, where variant forms of a name are related without the endorsement of one particular form. [19]

Authority control and cooperative cataloging Edit

Before the advent of digital Online public access catalogs and the Internet, creating and maintaining a library's authority files was generally carried out by individual cataloging departments within each library––that is, if such cataloguing was done at all. This often resulted in substantial disagreement between different libraries over which form of a given name was considered authoritative. As long as a library's catalog was internally consistent, differences between catalogs did not matter greatly.

However, even before the Internet revolutionized the way libraries go about cataloging their materials, catalogers began moving toward the establishment of cooperative consortia, such as OCLC and RLIN in the United States, in which cataloging departments from libraries all over the world contributed their records to, and took their records from, a shared database. This development prompted to the need for national standards for authority work.

In the United States, the primary organization for maintaining cataloging standards with respect to authority work operates under the aegis of the Library of Congress, and is known as the Name Authority Cooperative Program, or NACO Authority.[20]

Standards Edit

There are various standards using different acronyms.

See also Edit

  • Universal Authority File (Gemeinsame Normdatei or GND), authority file by the German National Library
  • Knowledge Organization Systems
  • Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) for representation of thesauri, classification schemes, taxonomies, subject-heading systems, or any other type of structured controlled vocabulary.
  • Virtual International Authority File (VIAF), an aggregation of authority files currently focused on personal and corporate names.
  • ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID), a nonproprietary alphanumeric code to uniquely identify scientific and other academic authors. Authors - including Wikipedia editors - may obtain an ORCID by signing up at[24]

Wording noteEdit

The word authority in authority control is related to the task of identifying a specific author, and is not to be confused with other senses of the word authority such as a power vested in a person or organization by the state.


  1. Block, Rick J. 1999. “Authority Control: What It Is and Why It Matters.”, accessed March 30, 2006
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 "Why Does a Library Catalog Need Authority Control and What Is It?". government of Vermont. November 25, 2012. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 "Cataloguing authority control policy". National Library of Australia. November 25, 2012. "The primary purpose of authority control is to assist the catalogue user in locating items of interest." 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 "Authority Control at LTI". LTI. November 25, 2012. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Kathleen L. Wells of the University of Southern Mississippi Libraries (November 25, 2012). "Got Authorities? Why Authority Control Is Good for Your Library". Tennessee Libraries. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 "Authority Control at the NMSU Library". New Mexico State University. November 25, 2012. 
  7. "Authority Control in the Card Environment". government of Vermont. November 25, 2012. Retrieved November 25, 2012. 
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 "brief guidelines on authority control decision-making". NCSU Libraries. November 25, 2012. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 "Authority Control in Unicorn WorkFlows August 2001". Rutgers University. November 25, 2012. "Why Authority Control?" 
  10. Burger, Robert H. Authority Work: the Creation, Use, Maintenance and Evaluation of Authority Records and Files. Littleton, Colo. : Libraries Unlimited, 1985
  11. Clack, Doris Hargrett. Authority Control: Principles, Applications, and Instructions. Chicago : American Library Association, 1990.
  12. Maxwell, Robert L. Maxwell's Guide to Authority Work. Chicago : American Library Association, 2002.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Karen Calhoun (June 1998). "A Bird's Eye View of Authority Control in Cataloging". Cornell University Library. Retrieved November 25, 2012. 
  14. Moya K. Mason (November 25, 2012). "Purpose of Authority Work and Files". 
  15. Wynar, B.S. 1992. Introduction to Cataloguing and Classification. 8th ed. Littleton, Co.: Libraries Unlimited.
  16. See Library of Congress authorities files note: the original record has been abbreviated for clarity.
  17. Karen Calhoun of the Cornell University Library in A Bird's Eye View of Authority Control in Cataloging
  18. Karen Calhoun of the Cornell University Library in A Bird's Eye View of Authority Control in Cataloging
  19. Note: See Linda Barnhart's Access Control Records: Prospects and Challenges from the 1996 OCLC conference 'Authority Control in the 21st Century' for more information.
  20. "NACO Home: NACO (Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), Library of Congress)". Retrieved 2011-12-18. 
  21. Template:Dead link
  22. "ICArchives : Page d'accueil : Accueil". Retrieved 2011-12-18. 
  23. Library of Congress Network Development and MARC Standards Office. "MARC 21 Format for Authority Data: Table of Contents (Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress)". Retrieved 2011-12-18. 
  24. Note: see

External linksEdit

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.